[j-nsp] Juniper BRAS

[Liam Murphy]

PPPoE will work for you if you have a layer 2 between your DSLAM and your MX5 but that will not be an LNS!; in my case I have an additional leg from which there will be IP thus needing L2TP; which means that my bundled sessions will MLPPPoLNS (sometimes call MLPPPoLTTP).


-----Original Message-----
From: mg at gw.ms [mailto:mg at gw.ms] On Behalf Of Matthias Brumm
Sent: 27 March 2012 16:08
To: Paul Stewart
Cc: Liam Murphy; juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Juniper BRAS

Hi!

We have just ordered some MX5 to have the opportunity to provide PPPoE for customers.

What exactly is the meaning of lacking LNS support? If I understand correctly LNS is the possibility to provide a tunnel endpoint for a L2TP tunnel, sent from a provider, for example a DSL provider. The
MX80(5) is capable of provide a PPPoE termination, if I have L2 access to the DSLAMs or access switches?

Regards,

Matthias

Am 26. März 2012 14:23 schrieb Paul Stewart <paul at paulstewart.org>:
> I'm not up to speed on the MLPPP stuff but would look at 
> MX240/MX480/MX960 platform for sure.  The MX80 can only handle about 
> 4k sessions and has no support for LNS yet I don't believe (coming though if I'm not mistaken).
>
> Paul
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Liam Murphy [mailto:Liam.Murphy at easynet.com]
> Sent: March-26-12 6:30 AM
> To: Paul Stewart; juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: RE: [j-nsp] Juniper BRAS
>
> About 4000 sessions.
> I am just not sure if I can have MLPPPoLT2P
>
> (i.e. up to 8 ppp sessions bundled inside a MLPPP session that 
> terminates on a Juniper that is acting as an LNS, with subscriber QoS).
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Paul Stewart
> Sent: 23 March 2012 20:40
> To: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Juniper BRAS
>
> What kind of capacity?  M/MX is only option outside of E/ERX series...
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Liam Murphy
> Sent: March-23-12 1:22 PM
> To: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [j-nsp] Juniper BRAS
>
> Which Juniper router (not E-Series) is best suited for a BRAS.
> (L2TP LNS with MLPPP)
>
> Regards
>
> Liam
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net 
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net 
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net 
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp