[j-nsp] Juniper BRAS

[Matthias Brumm]

Hi!

I hope our SE will have the insight to provide us with such suggestions.

We will use some MX5 for core and border routers, but one will provide
PPPoE in some time. So it is not a must thing now, and perhaps some
new software releases will provide better service in this matter.

Matthias

Am 27. März 2012 17:40 schrieb Paul Stewart <paul at paulstewart.org>:
> That's correct - if you have direct connectivity to the DSLAM's without the
> need to carry l2tp then you don't need the LNS functionality.
>
> If you wanted to "forward" that traffic to another provider (wholesale it
> out) then you might require LNS as a function as well.
>
> It sounds like your usage is similar to our usage to date - we own/operate
> our own DSLAM's therefore it's just "native PPPOE" for us.
>
> Be very careful on the software load you are running on the MX5 for this
> purpose - I would highly suggest working with your SE to find a stable and
> suitable software version.
>
> Paul
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mg at gw.ms [mailto:mg at gw.ms] On Behalf Of Matthias Brumm
> Sent: March-27-12 11:08 AM
> To: Paul Stewart
> Cc: Liam Murphy; juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Juniper BRAS
>
> Hi!
>
> We have just ordered some MX5 to have the opportunity to provide PPPoE for
> customers.
>
> What exactly is the meaning of lacking LNS support? If I understand
> correctly LNS is the possibility to provide a tunnel endpoint for a L2TP
> tunnel, sent from a provider, for example a DSL provider. The
> MX80(5) is capable of provide a PPPoE termination, if I have L2 access to
> the DSLAMs or access switches?
>
> Regards,
>
> Matthias
>
> Am 26. März 2012 14:23 schrieb Paul Stewart <paul at paulstewart.org>:
>> I'm not up to speed on the MLPPP stuff but would look at
>> MX240/MX480/MX960 platform for sure.  The MX80 can only handle about
>> 4k sessions and has no support for LNS yet I don't believe (coming though
> if I'm not mistaken).
>>
>> Paul
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Liam Murphy [mailto:Liam.Murphy at easynet.com]
>> Sent: March-26-12 6:30 AM
>> To: Paul Stewart; juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> Subject: RE: [j-nsp] Juniper BRAS
>>
>> About 4000 sessions.
>> I am just not sure if I can have MLPPPoLT2P
>>
>> (i.e. up to 8 ppp sessions bundled inside a MLPPP session that
>> terminates on a Juniper that is acting as an LNS, with subscriber QoS).
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
>> [mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Paul Stewart
>> Sent: 23 March 2012 20:40
>> To: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Juniper BRAS
>>
>> What kind of capacity?  M/MX is only option outside of E/ERX series...
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
>> [mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Liam Murphy
>> Sent: March-23-12 1:22 PM
>> To: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> Subject: [j-nsp] Juniper BRAS
>>
>> Which Juniper router (not E-Series) is best suited for a BRAS.
>> (L2TP LNS with MLPPP)
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Liam
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>