[j-nsp] Fwd: mx480 to mx240 port channel ae

[Mohammad Khalil]

Hi all , the issue is that upload traffic is load balanced but the download
is not
The traffic passing through the aggregate is Layer 4 traffic
I have configured hashing on Layer 3 and Layer 4 from the mx480 side
on the ex4200 side am getting prompted that the hashing is not supported ,
does anyone know if there is a specific image on the EX4200 that supports
hashing ?
Your input is highly appreciated

On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Mohammad Khalil <eng.mssk at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all
> AM still facing the same issue , one of the links are fully utilized and
> the other one has free space to utilize
> I have configured the below
> set forwarding-options hash-key family mpls label-1
> set forwarding-options hash-key family mpls label-2
> set forwarding-options hash-key family mpls payload ip
> set forwarding-options hash-key family inet layer-3
> set forwarding-options hash-key family inet layer-4
>
> But the downstream traffic is not balanced , even though the upload
> traffic is almost balanced
>
> Any ideas?
>
> BR,
> Mohammad
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 2:09 AM, Mohammad Khalil <eng.mssk at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> I am running MPLS in my network , L3 and VPLS
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 10:03 PM, Doan Nguyen <doan_group at yahoo.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Take off the MTU setting and leave it default.  Are you running any
>>> thing bigger than 1500 with DF bit set?
>>>
>>>   ------------------------------
>>> *From:* Mohammad Khalil <eng.mssk at gmail.com>
>>> *To:* juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>> *Sent:* Thursday, July 19, 2012 1:48 AM
>>> *Subject:* [j-nsp] Fwd: mx480 to mx240 port channel ae
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: Mohammad Khalil <eng.mssk at gmail.com>
>>> Date: Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 11:45 AM
>>> Subject: mx480 to mx240 port channel ae
>>> To: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi all , I have mx480 and mx240 routers
>>> I tried to connect them via ether channel (port aggregation) , but there
>>> was remarkable packet loss
>>>
>>> CR04# show interfaces ae1
>>> flexible-vlan-tagging;
>>> mtu 1600;
>>> encapsulation flexible-ethernet-services;
>>> aggregated-ether-options {
>>>     lacp {
>>>         active;
>>>     }
>>> }
>>> unit 0 {
>>>     family bridge {
>>>         interface-mode trunk;
>>>     }
>>> }
>>> unit 10 {
>>>     vlan-id 10;
>>>     family inet {
>>>         address 10.0.0.17/30;
>>>
>>> Any ideas ?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> BR,
>>> Mohammad
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>