[j-nsp] PIM Sparse issues on EX4200

[Phil Mayers]

On 11/21/2012 06:27 PM, Mauritz Lewies wrote:

> pim {
>      rp {
>          local {
>              address 10.172.12.14;
>              group-ranges {
>                  224.0.0.0/4;
>              }
>          }
>          static {
>              address 10.172.12.14 {
>                  group-ranges {
>                      224.0.0.0/4;
>                  }
>              }
>          }
>      }

This doesn't look right; why do you have both a "static" and "local" 
stanza for the RP?

The RP itself has "local". Everything else has "static" pointing to the 
RP. Who is 10.172.12.14 in this scenario?