[j-nsp] How reliable is EX multichassis? 3300 and 8200 switches

[Luca Salvatore]

Yes so GRES and NSR is configured am correctly then?

The AE is a VC-lag with one member on each switch. 

Luca

On 01/11/2012, at 3:56 AM, "Stefan Fouant" <sfouant at shortestpathfirst.net> wrote:

> On Oct 31, 2012, at 10:01 AM, Luca Salvatore <Luca at ninefold.com> wrote:
> 
>> Yep my mistake.
>> However I do have 'set chassis redundancy graceful-switchover' configured as well as 'set protocols nonestop-routing'
>> 
>> On 31/10/2012, at 11:24 PM, "Stefan Fouant" <sfouant at shortestpathfirst.net<mailto:sfouant at shortestpathfirst.net>> wrote:
>> 
>> I think you are confusing GRES w/ GR.  NSR and GRES are NOT mutually exclusive and in fact NSR requires it to function.
> 
> 'set chassis redundancy graceful-switchover' is GRES, not GR.
> 
>> What I actually see when the master switch robots is that the AE interfaces between my devices flaps. I think this causes my OSPF neighbours to go down.
>> 
>> I see this in the logs: "rpd[2241]: RPD_OSPF_NBRDOWN: OSPF neighbor 10.255.255.9 (realm ospf-v2 vlan.83 area 0.0.0.1) state changed from Full to Down due to KillNbr (event reason: interface went down"
> 
> Which device is the ae interface tied to?  Is it a VC-LAG with members tied to multiple physical devices, or is it comprised of only links belonging to a single device?
> 
> Stefan Fouant
> JNCIE-SEC, JNCIE-SP, JNCIE-ENT, JNCI
> Systems Engineer, Juniper Networks