[j-nsp] SRX - multipoint st0 tunnel interface and static route

[Mark Menzies]

Yup, what he said  :)

It will mean though that you will need 2 tunnel interfaces to place into 2
different routing instances.

This can be a little complicated but we dont really have many options if
the 2 remote sites have the same addressing scheme.

HTH

On 14 September 2012 15:59, Per Westerlund <p1 at westerlund.se> wrote:

> Yes, static routes work. What happens is that you put the two tunnels in
> different routing instances. The static route/routes used in each routing
> instance are completely independent of each other.
>
> /Per
>
> 14 sep 2012 kl. 15:55 skrev pkc_mls:
>
> > Le 14/09/2012 2:55, Per Westerlund a écrit :
> >> The only way to handle this that I know of is FBF, in this case to
> implement source-based-routing. You have to pick a different tunnel
> depending on which source address you see.
> >>
> >> I don't have access to my systems right now so I can't send an example,
> but there are plenty of examples on either in Juniper KB or Juniper forums.
> The common use case is with 2 default routes to 2 different ISPs, and
> having to chose one or the other based on what local IP address is used.
> >>
> >> /Per Westerlund
> >>
> >>
> > Do you know if the static nat will work in such a scenario, because I
> have a lot of static nat rules configured
> > for traffic through this tunnel ?
> >
> > It becomes complicated for a simple multi proxy ID configuration.
> > _______________________________________________
> > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>