[j-nsp] Config help for basic MPLS setup

Matthew Crocker matthew at corp.crocker.com
Mon Sep 24 20:29:21 EDT 2012


Multihop BGP between SRX & MX? The EXs don't need to learn the labels that are transiting?


--
Matthew S. Crocker
President
Crocker Communications, Inc.
PO BOX 710
Greenfield, MA 01302-0710

E: matthew at crocker.com
P: (413) 746-2760
F: (413) 746-3704
W: http://www.crocker.com



On Sep 24, 2012, at 8:17 PM, "Caillin Bathern" <caillinb at commtelns.com> wrote:

> Hi Matt,
>  
> You should only need iBGP between the PE routers, eg the SRX and the MX.  Just configure family inet-vpn unicast to pass the VRF/VPN routes.
>  
> Cheers,
> Caillin
>  
> From: Matthew Crocker [mailto:matthew at corp.crocker.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, 25 September 2012 9:16 AM
> To: Caillin Bathern
> Cc: sthaug at nethelp.no; juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Config help for basic MPLS setup
>  
>  
> The EX4200s will be P routes so I should be ok.  I'll get BGP running on the SRX & EXs tomorrow.  The SRX & MX80 will be PE.
>  
> I'll update tomorrow if I can't get it working.
>  
> Thanks.
>  
> --
> Matthew S. Crocker
> President
> Crocker Communications, Inc.
> PO BOX 710
> Greenfield, MA 01302-0710
> 
> E: matthew at crocker.com
> P: (413) 746-2760
> F: (413) 746-3704
> W: http://www.crocker.com
>  
>  
>  
> On Sep 24, 2012, at 6:55 PM, "Caillin Bathern" <caillinb at commtelns.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> On point 2 there, the ex can only process one label at a time but there could be a larger label stack than that so it can be a P router.
> From: sthaug at nethelp.no
> Sent: 25/09/2012 8:25 AM
> To: matthew at corp.crocker.com
> Cc: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Config help for basic MPLS setup
> 
> >  I have an MX80 and 3 EX4200s connected via 10GigE running MPLS, OSPF, etc.  I have some ethernet-ccc links working between the gear.
> > 
> > I'm trying to setup my first MPLS based routing VRF (L3VPN ???) between a new SRX210 and the MX80 (going through the EX4200s).
> > 
> > Eventually the configuration will look like this
> > 
> > <Internal LAN> -> SRX210 --[MPLS]--> EX4200 --[MPLS]--> EX4200 -- [MPLS] --> MX80 --[Internal LAN] --> Firewall
> > 
> > The SRX210 is a PE router owned and controlled by me.  I have a couple other basic IP routes on it for other customers.
> > 
> > The idea here is that all traffic on ge-0/0/0.0 gets routed to the MX80 through an LSP in the routing-instance corp.crocker.com
> > 
> > For testing the SRX is connected directly to the MX80 bypassing the EX4200s
> > 
> > SRX has OSPF going with MX80 but does not have BGP configured.
> > MX80 has BGP with my upstreams and other border routers
> > 
> > I'm sure I'm missing some MPLS filters or something but I'm not sure what.
> 
> I see a couple of problems here:
> 
> 1. MPLS L3VPNs use BGP to distribute the VPN label. Thus you *must*
> have a full BGP mesh between your PEs (or you can of course use route
> reflectors/confederations).
> 
> 2. As far as I know the EX switches can only handle *one* MPLS label.
> You need at least two labels for MPLS L3VPNs.
> 
> Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug at nethelp.no
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> -- 
> Message  protected by MailGuard: e-mail anti-virus, anti-spam and content filtering.http://www.mailguard.com.au/mg
> 
>  
>  
> Message protected by MailGuard: e-mail anti-virus, anti-spam and content filtering.
> http://www.mailguard.com.au/mg
> 
>   



More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list