[j-nsp] IP Monitoring/Tracking (SLA) on high end SRX

[Morgan McLean]

Could you ask them to use a routing protocol and implement some logic on
their side dictating when they advertise a default to you?

Morgan


On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Ahmad Hasan <barakat-ahmad at hotmail.com>wrote:

> BFD is not a valid option because the other end is cisco and the customer
> is
> using PBR, so based on their feedback they can't implement BFD along with
> PBR on cisco side
>
> BR,
> A.Hasan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Kawchuk [mailto:juniperdude at gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 3:47 AM
> To: Ahmad Hasan
> Cc: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] IP Monitoring/Tracking (SLA) on high end SRX
>
> How about a default 0.0.0.0/0 with a bfd-liveliness detection.
>
> We use this for conditionally routing statics every now and then.
>
> Works well assuming the next-hop supports BFD; and no dynamic routing
> protocol needed.
>
> - CK.
>
>
> On 16/08/2013, at 7:15 AM, Darren O'Connor <darrenoc at outlook.com> wrote:
>
> > You could run VRRP on R1 and R2 giving R1 the higher priority. Have
> > the static default on the SRX3600 pointing to the VRRP IP
> >
> > Darren
> > http://www.mellowd.co.uk/ccie
> >
> >
> >> From: barakat-ahmad at hotmail.com
> >> To: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> >> Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 13:16:49 +0300
> >> Subject: [j-nsp] IP Monitoring/Tracking (SLA) on high end SRX
> >>
> >> Dear All
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> We have high end SRX3600 connected to layer2 switch and then to two
> >> gateway routers, and we have a static default route to R1 with
> >> default preference
> >> (5) and to R2 with preference 10, we need to track the IP of R1 so
> >> that in case we couldn't ping R1 the route to prefer R2 i.e. in case
> >> the link between R1 and the layer2 switch went down the route to prefer
> R2.
> >>
> >> Noting that we were able to accomplish the above requirements with
> >> branch SRX using either two options (set services ip-monitoring) or
> >> (set services
> >> rpm)
> >>
> >> Unfortunately the mentioned commands are not supported on high end
> >> SRX
> >>
> >> Any ideas.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Regards
> >>
> >> A.Hasan
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>



-- 
Thanks,
Morgan