[j-nsp] SRX monitor-interface question

[Fahad Khan]

RG0 only contains Control Plane or REs.
In SRX failover, its not necessary to failover RG0 when there is a failover
in RG1 due to a link failure. So we only do interface-monitor in RG1, RG2
... not in RG0. RG0 already run in A/P mode.

It can be possible that SRX B is Primary in RG0 while Secondary in RG1
(means SRX A is Primary in RG 1)

Muhammad Fahad Khan
JNCIE-M # 756
Lead Network and Security Consultant - IBM
+92-301-8247638
Skype: fahad-ibm
http://pk.linkedin.com/in/muhammadfahadkhan


On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 2:07 PM, R S <dim0sal at hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> Hi
>
> In an SRX5800 cluster
> A/P deployment, does anybody recommend to monitor-interface also on RG0 or
> not
> ?
>
> PRO ? CONS ?
>
>
>
> We did it but
> unfortunately during an SPU crash the RG0 didn’t switch properly and JTAC
> told us it’s
> not recommended monitor-interface under RG0 in same corner case…
>
>
>
> Any experience to share
> is useful
>
>
>
> Tks
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>