[j-nsp] Is Juniper moving features to AFL on EX Series in 12.3?
Andrew Jones
andrew at commitconfirmed.com
Mon Feb 11 22:26:04 EST 2013
Sort of unrelated, but a quick question in regards to AFL's. I'm looking to
run BGP on a EX4500/4200 mixed mode VC (2 x 4500's, 2 x 4200's for 4
switches total) with the EX4500's as the RE and backup RE (preprovisioned).
Do I only need to purchase the AFL's for the EX4500's or all members of the
VC? Any other caveats I should be aware of?
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Skeeve Stevens <
skeeve+junipernsp at eintellegonetworks.com> wrote:
> Ahh sorry, didn't see it.
>
> Excellent to know. Someone was trying to scare us ;-)
>
> ...Skeeve
>
> *Skeeve Stevens - *eintellego Networks Pty Ltd
> skeeve at eintellegonetworks.com ; www.eintellegonetworks.com
>
> Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve
>
> facebook.com/eintellegonetworks ; <http://twitter.com/networkceoau>
> linkedin.com/in/skeeve
>
> twitter.com/networkceoau ; blog: www.network-ceo.net
>
>
> We are the bridge between business and technology
> Juniper - Cisco - Cloud
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Caillin Bathern <caillinb at commtelns.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Hi Skeeve,
> >
> > This has already been discussed in the "Junos 12.3 Release Date" thread
> > and a Juniper employee has stated that this is a documentation error
> > that will fixed.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Caillin
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> > [mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Skeeve Stevens
> > Sent: Friday, 8 February 2013 1:05 PM
> > To: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > Subject: [j-nsp] Is Juniper moving features to AFL on EX Series in 12.3?
> >
> > All,
> >
> > Something has just been pointed out to me, and I'd like to get the
> > communities take on it.
> >
> > It seems that Juniper has moved features to the Advanced Features
> > License in 12.3.
> >
> > *This is the link for the EX License Overview on 12.2*
> > http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos12.2/topics/concept/ex-series
> > -software-licenses-overview.html#jd0e146
> >
> > Features Requiring a License on EX3200, EX4200, EX4500, EX4550, EX6200,
> > and
> > EX8200 Switches
> >
> > To use the following features on Juniper Networks EX3200, EX4200,
> > EX4500, EX4550, EX6200, and EX8200 Ethernet Switches, you must install
> > an advanced feature license (AFL):
> >
> > - Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) and multiprotocol BGP (MBGP)
> > - Intermediate System-to-Intermediate System (IS-IS)
> > - IPv6 protocols: OSPFv3, RIPng, IS-IS for IPv6, IPv6 BGP
> > - MPLS with RSVP-based label-switched paths (LSPs) and MPLS-based
> > circuit cross-connects (CCCs)
> >
> > ---
> >
> > *This is the link for the EX License Overview on 12.3*
> > http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos12.3/topics/concept/ex-series
> > -software-licenses-overview.html#jd0e146
> >
> > Features Requiring a License on EX3200, EX4200, EX4500, EX4550, EX6200,
> > and
> > EX8200 Switches
> >
> > To use the following features on Juniper Networks EX3200, EX4200,
> > EX4500, EX4550, EX6200, and EX8200 Ethernet Switches, you must install
> > an advanced feature license (AFL):
> >
> > - Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) and multiprotocol BGP (MBGP)
> > - Generic Routing Encapsulation (GRE)
> > - Intermediate System-to-Intermediate System (IS-IS)
> > - Multicast Listener Discovery version 1 and 2 (MLDv1 and MLDv2)
> > - MPLS with RSVP-based label-switched paths (LSPs) and MPLS-based
> > circuit cross-connects (CCCs)
> > - Multicast Source Discovery Protocol (MSDP)
> > - RIPng (RIP next generation)
> > - OSPFv1/v2 (with four active interfaces)
> > - OSPFv3
> > - S-VLAN
> > - Unicast reverse-path forwarding (RPF)
> > - Virtual routing and forwarding (VRF)
> > - Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (VRRP)
> >
> >
> > Doesn't this increase the cost of these switches by a ton of money if
> > you want features you used to get for free?
> >
> > I would have thought that IPv6 would have been something that would have
> > started to be in the base license since everyone is starting to need it
> > as standard. This sounds a little opportunistic in my opinion.
> >
> > This looks like these layer 3 switches are becoming more and more like
> > Layer 2 dumb switches the higher the Junos version goes.
> >
> > Maybe 13.x will have IPv4 in AFL?
> >
> > ...Skeeve
> >
> > *Skeeve Stevens - *eintellego Networks Pty Ltd
> > skeeve at eintellegonetworks.com ; www.eintellegonetworks.com
> >
> > Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve
> >
> > facebook.com/eintellegonetworks ; <http://twitter.com/networkceoau>
> > linkedin.com/in/skeeve
> >
> > twitter.com/networkceoau ; blog: www.network-ceo.net
> >
> >
> > We are the bridge between business and technology Juniper - Cisco -
> > Cloud _______________________________________________
> > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> > --
> > Message protected by MailGuard: e-mail anti-virus, anti-spam and
> > content filtering.http://www.mailguard.com.au/mg
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list