[j-nsp] MX80 BGP performance after reboot
Stacy W. Smith
stacy at acm.org
Thu Feb 21 04:53:58 EST 2013
On Feb 21, 2013, at 2:31 AM, Sebastian Wiesinger <juniper-nsp at ml.karotte.org> wrote:
> * Sebastian Wiesinger <juniper-nsp at ml.karotte.org> [2013-02-19 13:57]:
>> Yes, I agree. But that's a design "decision" so ATAC is not
>> interested. I'll try to get this to Juniper trough my SE but I don't
>> know if that'll do any good.
>
> So Juniper is aware that this is a problem (at least for some people)
> and there are people working on it. It's not trivial so I don't expect
> any short-term solutions / improvement.
>
> There is also a NANOG discussion regarding this:
>
> http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2013-January/054694.html
>
> The current PR seems to be PR836197
>
> https://prsearch.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=prcontent&id=PR836197
Sebastian,
PR 836197 is a problem that some customers are seeing, but it is not the problem that you reported in this thread. Your issue appears to be (primarily) an issue with sampled.
--Stacy
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list