[j-nsp] Quick question regarding JunOS BGP
Christian
cdebalorre at neotelecoms.com
Fri Jan 11 13:38:42 EST 2013
Check for PR688820 ?
If "forwarding-options sampling" or "routing-options route-record" is
configured, stale routes may appear and persist in the routing table in
holddown state. Those routes are not active and do not affect
forwarding, but they do consume memory and if left will lead to the
memory footprint of RPD increasing over time. For mpls routes it will
also effect PFE and Kernel memory since the next-hops are not deleted
till the route is deleted within RPD. JUNOS version 10.4R7 and 11.2R3
are effected.
It should not interfere with uRPF though, as they are not active.
Christian
Le 11/01/2013 19:08, Drew Weaver a écrit :
> Does anyone know under what conditions routes will get into:
>
> State: <Delete Ext>
>
> I have almost 90,000 routes (bgp) like this, it obviously can cause problems when you combine this with uRPF loose.
>
> Thanks,
> -Drew
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list