[j-nsp] Quick question regarding JunOS BGP

Christian cdebalorre at neotelecoms.com
Fri Jan 11 13:38:42 EST 2013


Check for PR688820 ?

If "forwarding-options sampling" or "routing-options route-record" is 
configured, stale routes may appear and persist in the routing table in 
holddown state.  Those routes are not active and do not affect 
forwarding, but they do consume memory and if left will lead to the 
memory footprint of RPD increasing over time. For mpls routes it will 
also effect PFE and Kernel memory since the next-hops are not deleted 
till the route is deleted within RPD. JUNOS version 10.4R7 and 11.2R3 
are effected.

It should not interfere with uRPF though, as they are not active.

Christian

Le 11/01/2013 19:08, Drew Weaver a écrit :
> Does anyone know under what conditions routes will get into:
>
> State: <Delete Ext>
>
> I have almost 90,000 routes (bgp) like this, it obviously can cause problems when you combine this with uRPF loose.
>
> Thanks,
> -Drew
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp



More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list