[j-nsp] Junos labeled-unicast announces unusable routes, certainly this is a bug
Krasimir Avramski
krasi at smartcom.bg
Mon Jan 21 07:07:21 EST 2013
You CAN configure both AFI=1 SAFI=1 and AFI=1 SAFI=4 on the same BGP
session by specifying inet.3 for labeled-unicast routes:
family inet {
unicast;
labeled-unicast {
rib {
inet.3;
}
}
}
And redistributing LDP/RSVP routes from inet.3 makes perfect LSP stitching
through BGP-LU by label swapping.
Best Regards,
Krasi
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Jeff Wheeler <jsw at inconcepts.biz> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 4:27 AM, Alex Arseniev <alex.arseniev at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Probably not what you want to hear at the moment but it "is working as
> > designed".
>
> No, it isn't.
>
> Junos BGP is announcing routes it knows, for sure, are invalid. It
> knows that because BGP is making up a wrong label (2^20-1) because it
> hasn't allocated one, and it can't announce the route without a label.
> This is an inexcusable bug that is very far from "working as
> designed."
>
> The documentation is wrong, you cannot configure both AFI=1 SAFI=1 and
> AFI=1 SAFI=4 on the same BGP session. If it worked as documented, the
> above behavior would not happen, and AFI=1 SAFI=1 would be available
> to use for these routes. That is not the case.
>
> --
> Jeff S Wheeler <jsw at inconcepts.biz>
> Sr Network Operator / Innovative Network Concepts
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list