[j-nsp] MAG2600 versus 4610 and above

[David Gee]

Hi Clay,

First off, thanks to everyone who responded directly and through the group.

I have the DTE edition of the UAC and SA appliances, but some features like
the RADIUS server are not functional. I wanted to ideally test a wide set of
features and functionality, but at this point I think I will resign myself
to DTE testing and push our SE for a demo unit when the time is right.

Thanks again as always.
David

-----Original Message-----
From: Clay Haynes [mailto:chaynes at centracomm.net] 
Sent: 31 January 2013 15:57
To: David Gee; juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] MAG2600 versus 4610 and above

David,
Have you looked at the DTE Version of the SSLVPN? It's a full Virtual SA
Appliance that allows you to test out just about any feature. If you have a
valid support contract and/or are a partner you should be covered to test
out the features.


- Clay





On 1/31/13 7:06 AM, "David Gee" <dave at infiltr8.com> wrote:

>Hi group,
>
> 
>
>I was hoping if one of you could answer me the following question. When 
>it comes to base functionality, are the features on the MAG2600 
>identical to the MAG4610 and above? I appreciate scalability is 
>massively different, but it¹s more the configuration and base features 
>I am worried about. Is the
>MAG2600 missing anything barring guts? I want to be able to lab out as 
>many of the SSL/UAC  features without spending £4k on a box and I¹m 
>hoping the
>2600 covers everything I need. My intention is to run the lab license 
>for the twelve months whilst under a service contract. Will this be ok? 
>Does anyone know any different?
>
> 
>
>Thanks
>
>David
>
>_______________________________________________
>juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net 
>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp