[j-nsp] EX2200 Series

[Paulhamus, Jon]

Yes - it's usable with the AFL license, but I'm pretty sure on the EX2200,  it only allows 4 interfaces to participate in OSPF.

From: Bill Blackford [mailto:bblackford at gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2013 8:19 PM
To: Paulhamus, Jon
Cc: Doug McIntyre; juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] EX2200 Series

> Any features specifically that you're curios about?
Has anyone done/used the VC feature? How stable is it? Does it function in a similar manner to that of the EX4200's? How do they handle the loss of a member?

These will be closet stacks, so little need for any L3 functionality. However, in the event I bring L3 down to the access layer, is the OSPF implementation usable? (my experience has been on 3200/4200's primarily). I believe I read something about limitations.



On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Paulhamus, Jon <jpaulhamus at iu17.org<mailto:jpaulhamus at iu17.org>> wrote:
We have well approximately 75 of the 2200's and closer to 250 of the 4200's / 4500's either standalone or in VC.     A few bugs along the way with earlier code - but now we've stuck with 11.4R5.7 code and all is well.  I've mixed the 2200's with mostly Cisco, and 3com / HP and have had no issues with compatibility other than a few gotchas with VLAN pruning on the Cisco's that we easily accounted for.  For what it's worth, we also use SRX's combined with Cisco routers and firewalls for VPN's as well without any issues.

Any features specifically that you're curios about?




From: Doug McIntyre [merlyn at geeks.org<mailto:merlyn at geeks.org>]
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2013 6:47 PM
To: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net<mailto:juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] EX2200 Series

On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 03:09:16PM -0700, Bill Blackford wrote:
> I am interested in hearing any feedback about the EX2200. In particular,
> anyone who has done a recent enterprise deployment in a converged and in
> particular, a mixed vendor environment.

I've used the EX2200's, and aside from the "limited" features compared
to the rest of the EX line, they operate exactly the same, just missing
a couple things that are mentioned in the datasheets. Although they
recently (12.x) brought Virtual Chassis to it, I haven't done that yet.

As to mixed vendor, you'd have to state what protocols you are
expecting in a mixed vendor? They do STP and RSTP just fine. They
won't do cisco proprietary protocols, such as CDP or VDP. They have
standards based proprotocols that are equivilent. I've done OSPF and
BGP (still accounting for all switches have limited BGP route space)
with no issues.

Overall, I've had much less problems with the Juniper switches (aside
from some bad releases, especially on the EX4550 line) than my cisco
switches all around. I have had some wonkiness getting especially old
cisco software talking, but the problem has always been on the cisco side.
Usually upgrading the cisco to newer code solved their bugs (ie. LACP).

_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net<mailto:juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net<mailto:juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp



--
Bill Blackford

Logged into reality and abusing my sudo privileges.....