[j-nsp] VPLS route reflection

Mihai Gabriel mihaigabriel at gmail.com
Tue Jul 2 03:06:46 EDT 2013


VPLS with RR works very well for me in a small lab (see the example below).
Make sure that your loopbacks are reachable through ldp and mpls is enabled
on the interfaces.

mx5t# top show logical-systems r1 protocols bgp
group rr-client {
    type internal;
    local-address 172.27.255.1;
    family l2vpn {
        signaling;
    }
    neighbor 172.27.255.5;
}
mx5t# top show logical-systems r2 protocols bgp
group rr-client {
    type internal;
    local-address 172.27.255.2;
    family l2vpn {
        signaling;
    }
    neighbor 172.27.255.5;
}

mx5t# top show logical-systems r5 protocols bgp
group rr {
    type internal;
    local-address 172.27.255.5;
    family l2vpn {
        signaling;
    }
    cluster 0.0.0.1;
    neighbor 172.27.255.1;
    neighbor 172.27.255.2;
}
mx5t# run show route protocol bgp logical-system r5 table bgp.l2vpn.0

bgp.l2vpn.0: 2 destinations, 2 routes (2 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
+ = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both

65555L:1:1:1/96
                   *[BGP/170] 00:09:14, localpref 100, from 172.27.255.1
                      AS path: I, validation-state: unverified
                    > to 172.27.0.26 via ge-1/1/6.53, Push 299808
65555L:1:2:1/96
                   *[BGP/170] 00:09:14, localpref 100, from 172.27.255.2
                      AS path: I, validation-state: unverified
                    > to 172.27.0.21 via ge-1/1/6.54, Push 299888


mx5t# run show route protocol bgp logical-system r1 table bgp.l2vpn.0

bgp.l2vpn.0: 1 destinations, 1 routes (1 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
+ = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both

65555L:1:2:1/96
                   *[BGP/170] 00:02:49, localpref 100, from 172.27.255.5
                      AS path: I, validation-state: unverified
                    > to 172.27.0.2 via ge-1/1/7.12

mx5t# run show route protocol bgp logical-system r2 table bgp.l2vpn.0

bgp.l2vpn.0: 1 destinations, 1 routes (1 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
+ = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both

65555L:1:1:1/96
                   *[BGP/170] 00:03:00, localpref 100, from 172.27.255.5
                      AS path: I, validation-state: unverified
                    > to 172.27.0.1 via ge-1/1/6.21

mx5t# run show vpls mac-table logical-system r1 | find Bridging

 Bridging domain : __vpls-test__, VLAN : NA
   MAC                 MAC      Logical          NH     RTR
   address             flags    interface        Index  ID
   64:87:88:5e:a5:1c   D        vt-1/0/10.84934912
   64:87:88:5e:a5:1d   D        ge-1/1/5.555


On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 7:07 AM, James Jun <james at towardex.com> wrote:

> Hey all,
>
> So, I've been trying to google for some sample configuration of
> BGP-signalled VPLS setup using route-reflectors, and having some trouble
> finding one.  All of the sample BGP-signaled examples on Juniper site are
> using full-mesh iBGP between PE's with no RR's in the middle.
>
>
> A pretty simple and straight-forward iBGP topology like this, that we're
> all used to in a typical SP network:
>
>  CE -- PE (rr client) ----- P (route-reflector) ------ P (route-reflector
> ) ----- PE (rr client) -- CE
>
>
> So, lacking any config examples, I've just enabled 'family l2vpn
> signaling;' on existing iBGP sessions that are using the above topology.
> Unfortunately, the route-reflector / P-router does not reflect the route
> received from PE and vice versa -- it is behaving like non-RR client peer
> that wants full mesh.
>
> When viewing bgp.l2vpn.0 RIB, routers can only see l2vpn NLRI's received
> from directly configured / meshed peer, but cannot see thru a
> route-reflector (i.e. P router cannot see NLRIs from a PE that's attached
> thru another P serving as route-reflector).  Please note that unicast
> inet.0 and inet6.0 RIBs are also carried by same iBGP session transports
> across the topology -- and those routes obviously work flawlessly using
> route-reflectors.
>
>
> Setup looks like this on a P router:
>
> bgp {
>   group teh-core {
>     type internal;
>     family inet {
>       unicast;
>     }
>     family inet6 {
>       unicast;
>     }
>     family l2vpn {
>       signaling;
>     }
>     export mp64-ibgp-export-policy;
>     peer-as 64552;
>     neighbor 10.0.0.2 {
>       description core1.lab2;
>     }
>     neighbor 10.0.0.3 {
>       description core1.lab3;
>     }
>   }
>
>   group PE-edge-routers__RR-clients {
>     type internal;
>     family inet {
>       unicast;
>     }
>     family inet6 {
>       unicast;
>     }
>     family l2vpn {
>       signaling;
>     }
>     export mp64-ibgp-export-policy;
>     cluster 10.0.0.1;
>     peer-as 64552;
>     neighbor 10.0.1.1 {
>       description edge1.lab1;
>     }
>     neighbor 10.0.1.2 {
>       description edge2.lab1;
>     }
>   }
>
> }
>
>
> Thanks in advance!
> james
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>


More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list