[j-nsp] Advice on a 100Gbps+ environment

Mark Tinka mark.tinka at seacom.mu
Tue Jul 2 10:17:56 EDT 2013


On Tuesday, July 02, 2013 03:00:30 PM Dobbins, Roland wrote:

> Doh - MX*480*, not MX*80*.  My mistake.

Well, in fairness, the only thing that kills the MX80 is 
that crappy PPC control plane.

If you can keep your peer sessions under control, the 
forwarding plane should happily a fair bit of peering 
traffic (admittedly, not 100Gbps).

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/attachments/20130702/e0066a2e/attachment.sig>


More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list