[j-nsp] Advice on a 100Gbps+ environment
Mark Tinka
mark.tinka at seacom.mu
Tue Jul 2 10:17:56 EDT 2013
On Tuesday, July 02, 2013 03:00:30 PM Dobbins, Roland wrote:
> Doh - MX*480*, not MX*80*. My mistake.
Well, in fairness, the only thing that kills the MX80 is
that crappy PPC control plane.
If you can keep your peer sessions under control, the
forwarding plane should happily a fair bit of peering
traffic (admittedly, not 100Gbps).
Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/attachments/20130702/e0066a2e/attachment.sig>
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list