[j-nsp] Advice on a 100Gbps+ environment

[Haynes, Matthew]

Just a smaller FIB table is all I know of, we use them in a few places as transit peering points for the time being. We will probably upgrade to 480's at some point depending on the amount of routes when Ipv6 kicks in and the amount of traffic.

Matt

-----Original Message-----
From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Drew Weaver
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 9:56 AM
To: 'Dobbins, Roland'; 'juniper-nsp Puck'
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Advice on a 100Gbps+ environment

And what is wrong with the MX80 as a peering/transit router for up to 80Gbps of traffic?

Thanks,
-Drew


-----Original Message-----
From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Dobbins, Roland
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 9:01 AM
To: juniper-nsp Puck
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Advice on a 100Gbps+ environment


On Jul 2, 2013, at 7:19 PM, Mark Tinka wrote:

> Says who?

Doh - MX*480*, not MX*80*.  My mistake.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins at arbor.net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>

	  Luck is the residue of opportunity and design.

		       -- John Milton


_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp