[j-nsp] Advice on a 100Gbps+ environment

[Christian de Balorre]

Slow control-plane. No RE redundancy. More limited rib & fib than 
regular MX. Cryptic licensing scheme.
Otherwise nothing really wrong.

Christian

Le 02/07/2013 15:55, Drew Weaver a écrit :
> And what is wrong with the MX80 as a peering/transit router for up to 80Gbps of traffic?
>
> Thanks,
> -Drew
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Dobbins, Roland
> Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 9:01 AM
> To: juniper-nsp Puck
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Advice on a 100Gbps+ environment
>
>
> On Jul 2, 2013, at 7:19 PM, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>> Says who?
> Doh - MX*480*, not MX*80*.  My mistake.
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Roland Dobbins <rdobbins at arbor.net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>
>
> 	  Luck is the residue of opportunity and design.
>
> 		       -- John Milton
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp