[j-nsp] SRX devices upgraded to 2GB ram

Paul Stewart paul at paulstewart.org
Mon Jul 22 08:04:48 EDT 2013


This is definitely concerning as we have quite a number of SRX100/110
deployed (we use them for managed SOHO services).  I haven't seen any
discontinuation notice - anyone else?  I agree though that it's just a
matter of time thoughŠ..

Paul


On 2013-07-21 1:42 AM, "Skeeve Stevens"
<skeeve+junipernsp at eintellegonetworks.com> wrote:

>Yes,
>
>Looks like the SX100B and SRX100H have been discontinued and replaced with
>the SRX100H2.
>
>Also SRX110H-V{A,B} replaced with SRX110H2-V{A,B} models.
>
>I think the requirements for UTM and AppSecure needs more RAM.
>
>
>
>
>...Skeeve
>
>*Skeeve Stevens - *eintellego Networks Pty Ltd
>skeeve at eintellegonetworks.com ; www.eintellegonetworks.com
>
>Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve
>
>facebook.com/eintellegonetworks ;  <http://twitter.com/networkceoau>
>linkedin.com/in/skeeve
>
>twitter.com/networkceoau ; blog: www.network-ceo.net
>
>
>The Experts Who The Experts Call
>Juniper - Cisco - Cloud
>
>
>On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Michael Dale <mdale at dalegroup.net>
>wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Just wondering if anyone has noticed that it looks like the entire SRX
>> branch range has been upgraded to 2GB ram:
>> http://www.juniper.net/us/en/local/pdf/datasheets/1000281-en.pdf
>>
>> These models need at least JunOS 12.1X44-D15
>>
>> I just took delivery of a bunch of SRX110s and I suspect these are now
>>the
>> old models. Bit of a pain!
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Michael.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>>
>_______________________________________________
>juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp





More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list