[j-nsp] EX2200 OSPF question

[Mark Tinka]

On Wednesday, May 22, 2013 11:17:29 PM Paul Stewart wrote:

> You have to buy the extended feature license on the
> EX2200 to run OSPF. We have a bunch of EX2200-C deployed
> that have OSPF routes on them and they work fine - to
> qualify that though, there is very little traffic
> through them at layer3 - cant' see them handling much
> layer3 traffic. That deployment is mainly layer2
> oriented.

It's a shame that Juniper make you pay for an IS-IS license 
to run it on the lower-/mid-end EX platforms, yet all an 
operator might want that for is management access.

Maybe some bright soul at Juniper will come up with yet-
another-license where we can run IS-IS in "management access 
mode".

Granted, all you'll get today, if you turn it on, is 
complaints about it not having a license, but Juniper are 
now seriously threatening software enforcement in upcoming 
code.

Mark.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/attachments/20130523/35bfd199/attachment.sig>