[j-nsp] per-unit-scheduling, vlan shaping, MX480

[Jerry Jones]

Yes you need the Q flavor to do per clan or HQOS

Whether you require an MPC1/2/etc depends on the interfaces you need

An MPC1 will support up to 2 MIC with 20 afp, or 2 XFP, or one each. If you require higher bandwidth then look at the MPC2

I would also go with an MPC1E instead of an MPC1

Also will need to know how many routes to support

The non R version only supports 32k in FIB. This may be enough, if not then add the R option

Juniper has a nice doc to explain most of this

http://www.juniper.net/us/en/local/pdf/datasheets/1000294-en.pdf

http://www.juniper.net/us/en/local/pdf/datasheets/1000378-en.pdf


On Nov 14, 2013, at 5:24 PM, Scott Harvanek <scott.harvanek at login.com> wrote:

Hey guys,

What's the correct MIC/MPC combination to support per-vlan shaping? ( the mpc/mic supported feature docs are a bit confusing on this ) We're having success with a MX80 sporting a MIC-3D-20GE-SFP but looking to add a MX480 to replace some aging hardware and would like that same ability.  I'm assuming I need a MPC1-Q and the same MIC at the minimum ( preferably a MPC2-Q )?

-- 
Scott H.

_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp