[j-nsp] [c-nsp] NTP Sources placement in MPLS network

[Yham]

Hi Mark, Jared,

Do you really think enabling NTP service on routers can burdening them. I
mean in hierarchical way where RR and directly connected with ntp sources
and then all PEs use RR as ntp master and CEs further down use PEs as NTP
master?

Jared,

Quick question, why you think anycast IP on NTP servers is better then
configuring multiple individual servers on devices. One advantage of
anycast i can think is since (i believe) device choose ntp that has better
stratum and if its same it choose ntp who respond first if multiple ntp
servers are configured so if anycast ip is used, device will reach only to
closest device.

I try to read about ntp with anycast ip and found a doc that talk about
some risk that i couldn't understand. below is the snippet and source. can
you please comment on this please?

"NTP will also normally work with Anycast. A small risk with NTP is that it
generally requires
at least two packets from both server and client to get a proper
synchronization. If the server
fails after the first packet, it will take an extra packet to synchronize
with the next available NTP
server. The Simple Network Time Protocol (SNTP) does not have this problem."

http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.116.6367&rep=rep1&type=pdf
page-8

Regards

Regards


On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka at seacom.mu> wrote:

> On Tuesday, November 19, 2013 02:02:43 PM Jared Mauch wrote:
>
> > We have servers in each location with NTP synced to local
> > stratum 1 or 2 clocks. Customers are given an anycast ip
> > that points to these for time sources. We configure
> > routers to point at these local sources.
>
> Agree - better to put that on servers running than burdening
> routers with NTP functionality in addition to other daily
> tasks.
>
> Mark.
>