[j-nsp] BGP/L3 routing support on EX2200 & EX2200-C

[Tom Storey]

Interesting. Has anyone tried this with protocols like IS-IS and with IPv6?
I'd love to add an EX3200 to my lab, but shelling out for a license would
make it a bit too expensive.
On 27 Nov 2013 00:25, "Paul S." <contact at winterei.se> wrote:

> From what I've seen, the license is mainly a 'nag license,' at least for
> BGP.
>
> I've got quite a few customers doing BGP on the aforementioned products
> without the AFL, all it appears to affect is that it whines every single
> time a commit is performed -- yet continues to function fine.
>
> This doesn't mean you shouldn't buy it, but it does offer /some/ leeway.
>
> -- Paul
>
> On 11/27/2013 午前 07:47, Yucong Sun wrote:
>
>> nvm , looks like it still does:, quoting the software license bit.
>>
>> Sigh!
>>
>> To use the following features on EX3200, EX4200, EX4500, EX4550, EX8200,
>> and EX9200 switches, you must install an advanced feature license (AFL):
>>
>>     - Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) and multiprotocol BGP (MBGP)
>>     - Intermediate System-to-Intermediate System (IS-IS)
>>     - IPv6 routing protocols: IS-IS for IPv6, IPv6 BGP, IPv6 for MBGP
>>     - Logical systems (available only on EX9200 switches)
>>     - MPLS with RSVP-based label-switched paths (LSPs) and MPLS-based
>>     circuit cross-connects (CCCs) (Not supported on EX9200 switches)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Yucong Sun <sunyucong at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>  specifically,  for BGP and wire-speed ip routing, at least that's how i
>>> intereprt the datasheet.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Yucong Sun <sunyucong at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>  Thanks for the link, what about EX3200 ? EX3200 doesn't need AFL for l3
>>>> features?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Skeeve Stevens <
>>>> skeeve+junipernsp at eintellegonetworks.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  To quote:
>>>>> http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos/topics/
>>>>> concept/ex-series-software-licenses-overview.html#jd0e63
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, I agree it is vague.   I'd like more information about the amount
>>>>> if Layer 3 interfaces (RVI/SVI), Static routing, etc... which, the
>>>>> theory
>>>>> if it can do OSFP, then should be able to do some of that.  Even VRRP
>>>>> means
>>>>> layer 3 interfaces should be functional in some way.
>>>>>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> Features Requiring a License on EX2200 Switches
>>>>>
>>>>> For EX2200 switches, the following features can be added to basic Junos
>>>>> OS by installing an enhanced feature license (EFL):
>>>>>
>>>>>     - Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD)
>>>>>     - Connectivity fault management (IEEE 802.1ag)
>>>>>     - IGMP (Internet Group Management Protocol) version 1 (IGMPv1),
>>>>>     IGMPv2, and IGMPv3
>>>>>     - OSPFv1/v2 (with four active interfaces)
>>>>>     - Protocol Independent Multicast (PIM) dense mode, PIM
>>>>>     source-specific mode, PIM sparse mode
>>>>>     - Q-in-Q tunneling (IEEE 802.1ad)
>>>>>     - Real-time performance monitoring (RPM)
>>>>>     - Virtual Router
>>>>>     - Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (VRRP)
>>>>>     -
>>>>>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ...Skeeve
>>>>>
>>>>> *Skeeve Stevens - *eintellego Networks Pty Ltd
>>>>> skeeve at eintellegonetworks.com ; www.eintellegonetworks.com
>>>>>
>>>>> Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve
>>>>>
>>>>> facebook.com/eintellegonetworks ;  <http://twitter.com/networkceoau>
>>>>> linkedin.com/in/skeeve
>>>>>
>>>>> twitter.com/theispguy ; blog: www.theispguy.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The Experts Who The Experts Call
>>>>> Juniper - Cisco - Cloud
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Yucong Sun <sunyucong at gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  The datasheet is conveniently vague here,  Do any know whether these
>>>>>> two
>>>>>> support BGP? and how much instances/peers can they support? Also, do
>>>>>> they
>>>>>> have wire routing capability (suspiciously missing from data sheet
>>>>>> too)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> BTW: Why is it so hard to get a cheap & decent l3 switch? EX2200-C
>>>>>> looks
>>>>>> perfect fit for a few uplinks, too bad if it doesn't support BGP!
>>>>>>  it's
>>>>>> not
>>>>>> like it is complex software feature or anything. EX3200 on the other
>>>>>> hand,
>>>>>> does everything, but with way too many ports necessary.
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>  _______________________________________________
>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp