[j-nsp] Spanning Tree Inconsistent State
Peter Tavenier
petertavenier at gmail.com
Thu Oct 3 01:50:19 EDT 2013
Seems to be something strange indeed. On the root switch all the interfaces should be in DESG state.
Maybe shutting down port xe-1/1/0.0 helps this weird state, that is the port which is in a "IMPOSSIBLE EVENT/STATE"
You could also try to restart the eswd process (Ethernet switching daemon), that's where spanning tree processing happens, but that is definitely impacting.
Best regards,
Peter Tavenier
> Op 3 okt. 2013 om 01:50 heeft Crist Clark <cjc+j-nsp at pumpky.net> het volgende geschreven:
>
> I am a little confused about the spanning tree state on an EX4200 VC,
> running 11.4R5.5.
>
>
>
> {master:0}
> cjc at dmz4200> show spanning-tree bridge
>
> STP bridge parameters
> Context ID : 0
> Enabled protocol : RSTP
> Root ID : 32768.88:e0:f3:77:53:81
> Hello time : 2 seconds
> Maximum age : 20 seconds
> Forward delay : 15 seconds
> Message age : 0
> Number of topology changes : 20
> Time since last topology change : 3661899 seconds
> Topology change initiator : xe-0/1/0.0
> Topology change last recvd. from : 88:e0:f3:74:51:6a
> Local parameters
> Bridge ID : 32768.88:e0:f3:77:53:81
> Extended system ID : 0
> Internal instance ID : 0
>
> {master:0}
> cjc at dmz4200> show spanning-tree interface
>
> Spanning tree interface parameters for instance 0
>
> Interface Port ID Designated Designated Port State Role
> port ID bridge ID Cost
> ge-0/0/0.0 128:513 128:513 32768.88e0f3775381 20000 FWD DESG
> ge-0/0/47.0 128:560 128:560 32768.88e0f3775381 20000 FWD DESG
> xe-0/1/0.0 128:609 128:609 32768.88e0f3775381 2000 FWD ROOT
> xe-0/1/2.0 128:611 128:611 32768.88e0f3775381 2000 FWD DESG
> ge-1/0/0.0 128:625 128:625 32768.88e0f3775381 20000 FWD DESG
> ge-1/0/47.0 128:672 128:672 32768.88e0f3775381 20000 FWD DESG
> xe-1/1/0.0 128:721 128:776 32768.50c58dac4c81 2000 BLK ALT
> xe-1/1/2.0 128:723 128:723 32768.88e0f3775381 2000 FWD DESG
>
>
> So what I'm confused about is that the "show spanning-tree bridge" output
> says that this switch is the root bridge, yet the per-interface output
> indicates that there are ROOT and ALT ports. Also, the bridge ID for the
> ROOT port is the switch itself? Whereas the ALT port is what I would
> expect, except that it again seems to contradict the idea that this switch
> is the root bridge.
>
>
>
> I think my RSTP on this switch is in some messed up state? When I turn on
> traceoptions for rstp, I see sucpicious stuff like,
>
>
> Oct 2 11:26:59.532378 PISM: Port xe-1/1/0.0: IMPOSSIBLE EVENT/STATE
> Combination Occured
> Oct 2 11:26:59.532396 PISM: Event routine returned FAILURE
> Oct 2 11:26:59.532414 MSG: RstPortInfoMachine function returned FAILURE!
>
> Oct 2 11:26:59.532441 RECV: PortReceiveStateMachine Action returned
> FAILURE!
>
> Oct 2 11:26:59.532467 MSG: RstPortReceiveMachine function returned FAILURE!
>
> Oct 2 11:26:59.532493 MSG: RstHandleInBpdu function FAILED!
>
> Is there a low risk way to reset RSTP on a production switch?
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list