[j-nsp] MX80 Route table Size

[Mark Tinka]

On Tuesday, September 24, 2013 04:50:41 PM Paul Stewart 
wrote:

> Not to hi-jack this thread but does anyone know
> *real-world* numbers yet on the MX104 RE?  I know it has
> more memory and is supposed to be "faster" but have no
> idea yet how much faster it really is?
> 
> We don't have any in our network yet but anxious to
> deploy one end of year...

MX104 is a PPC board as well. So don't expect the RE to be 
that much quicker than the MX80.

That said, unlike the MX80, the MX104's RE's are modular. So 
hopefully, in the future, when Juniper can grow x86-based 
RE's for the MX104 within budget, we shall see some speed on 
this platform's control and management planes.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/attachments/20130924/c855fb0f/attachment.sig>