[j-nsp] Are IRB interfaces still not functional under SRX?

Ben Dale bdale at comlinx.com.au
Wed Apr 2 18:10:41 EDT 2014


On the branch at least - if you configure an irb interface, the box will fail commit check unless it is in transparent mode and it is only useable for management

On 3 Apr 2014, at 7:05 am, Per Westerlund <p1 at westerlund.se> wrote:

> I'm offline right now, but last time I checked, IRBs with bridge domains (SRX in transparent/L2 mode) were only used for management, no forwarding of transit traffic possible.
> 
> /Per
> 
>> 2 apr 2014 kl. 21:46 skrev Morgan McLean <wrx230 at gmail.com>:
>> 
>> Just double checking that IRB interfaces are not able to be used for
>> routing under the SRX3k and 5k series? I have a customer asking to have
>> cabinets uplink directly to the SRX3600 (no cluster), which means I'd have
>> to use bridge domains.
>> 
>> But, I don't think this will even work. Am I correct?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Morgan
>> _______________________________________________
>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> 
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp




More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list