[j-nsp] MX104 RE performance

Gavin Henry ghenry at suretec.co.uk
Sun Apr 13 16:07:33 EDT 2014


Any news yet?

Am looking at a new MX5 with upgrade licenses vs this with 2 x 10G

Thanks.
On 14 Jul 2013 01:53, "Darius Jahandarie" <djahandarie at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 7:28 PM, Mark Tees <marktees at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Has anyone had a chance to compare the MX104 RE performance against the
> MX80s line?
> >
> > Or is it not out in the wild yet?
> >
> > I have heard some pretty bad stories about the MX80 line in terms of RE
> performance when converging full IPv4 tables from 3-4 BGP peerings and
> comments here seem to indicate the same.
>
> My understanding is that it's not shipping yet, so it wouldn't be in
> production anywhere, but some people have it in labs.
>
> At the very least, it has redundant REs, which makes it a much nicer
> box than the MX80 IMO -- but whether the performance issues are solved
> or not is another issue. I'd be very happy to hear if there are any
> improvements on that front.
>
> --
> Darius Jahandarie
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>


More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list