[j-nsp] Full BGP table, one provider w/ 2 routers, slow forwarding convergence

[Darren O'Connor]

I've been hearing for years that quicker convergence is coming 'in a later release' 

Thanks
Darren
http://www.mellowd.co.uk/ccie



> From: scott at granados-llc.net
> To: euang+juniper-nsp at lists.eusahues.co.uk
> Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 10:40:29 -0400
> CC: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Full BGP table, one provider w/ 2 routers,	slow	forwarding convergence
> 
> I can confirm with inline flow sampling enabled and even with the code to fix the PR convergence is still slower.  I hear there’s a better fix being released in later code 14.2 if memory serves but I’m not sure.
> 
> On Aug 22, 2014, at 5:13 AM, Euan Galloway <euang+juniper-nsp at lists.eusahues.co.uk> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 03:38:32PM -0400, Clarke Morledge wrote:
> > 
> >> I did upgrade to 13.3R3 to try to resolve PR963060, but I am still seeing 
> >> enough traffic loss that it makes me skeptical as to whether I have really 
> >> hit this PR, if the issue has not really been resolved, or if something 
> >> else is going on.   I still think Junos should converge faster.
> > 
> > Did you try disabling inline jflow (and sampling if used), which would answer 
> > the is it/isn't it on that PR (and someone/something to shout at).
> > 
> > -- 
> > Euan Galloway
> > _______________________________________________
> > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp