[j-nsp] 12.1X for SRX

[Tyler Christiansen]

Just don't forget to read the release notes thoroughly (especially the
Known Issues) and read through any known PRs before you do an upgrade to
make sure they don't affect you.  Lot of research and paperwork in version
certification for your organization, but saves so much headache.

--tc


On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:47 PM, Quoc Hoang <quochoang at yahoo.com> wrote:

> Thank you all for the feedback so far.  Glad to hear that 12.1X is stable
> so far.
>
> Unfortunately, I can't see the same for 11.4. We've stepped on a number of
> bugs.
>
>
>   On Friday, August 22, 2014 7:48 PM, Graham Brown <
> juniper-nsp at grahambrown.info> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Quoc,
>
> Just to add what Tyler has already provided. I have been running SRX,
> mainly branch on 12.1R6.5 since release without a single bug. 12.1X44D30
> since release without issue and I'm now evaluating 12.1X46D20 - no bugs
> found yet.
>
> Were talking about hundreds of SRX, not just a few. Granted, not all
> features are used but I've certainly found the code to be rock solid.
>
> HTH,
> Graham
>
> Graham Brown
> Twitter - @mountainrescuer <https://twitter.com/#!/mountainrescuer>
> LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/grahamcbrown>
>
>
> On 23 August 2014 11:05, Tyler Christiansen <tyler at adap.tv> wrote:
>
> Have used 12.1X on branch (550) and HE (1400) for over a year without any
> (known) bugs.  Ran into one issue on one of the 1400s in which IPSec phase
> 1 & 2 would establish (and re-establish after being cleared) but would not
> forward IPSec traffic for route-based or policy-based tunnels.  Traffic
> forwarding for everything except IPSec was fine (otherwise phrase 1/2
> wouldn't come up).  No root cause or bug ID on that one because JTAC was
> taking too long to diagnose, so I'm not sure if it's a 12.1X bug or just a
> random freak accident.
>
> --tc
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 3:44 PM, Quoc Hoang via juniper-nsp <
> juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >   JTAC recently updated their recommendation for SRX to 12.1X which
> > specifically supports the security platform.
> > We are currently on the 11.4  train (for both branch and HE) but
> > evaluating the latest 12.1X as a possible next rev.  Any stability
> concerns
> > or major bugs that we should be aware? Would be interested in hearing
> > everyone's experiences.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Quoc
> > _______________________________________________
> > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-ns
> > <https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp>
>
> > ​​
> >
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
>
>
>
>


-- 

*Tyler Christiansen | Technical Operations*
tyler <http://adap.tv/>@adap.tv <http://adap.tv/> | www.adap.tv
*m :* 864.346.4095