[j-nsp] 答复: Filtering rib-group imported direct routes?
Jack Xu
xujianlx at gmail.com
Wed Dec 10 03:26:55 EST 2014
Hi, Mark
I have a such configure, it works as I wise, just a month ago!
Here is my config:
routing-options {
interface-routes {
rib-group inet CT;
}
static {
route 0.0.0.0/0 next-hop 58.215.51.1;
}
rib-groups {
CNC {
import-rib [ inet.0 cnc.inet.0 ];
import-policy test;
}
CT {
import-rib [ inet.0 cnc.inet.0 ];
import-policy test;
}
}
}
policy-options {
policy-statement test {
term 1 {
from {
route-filter 192.168.2.0/24 orlonger;
route-filter 192.168.3.0/24 orlonger;
}
then accept;
}
term default {
then reject;
}
}
}
Best Regards,
Jack Xu
Senior Engineer
Tel:(86)-13524613903
QQ:838178533
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] 代表 Mark Tees
发送时间: 2014年11月16日 6:45
收件人: Chris Woodfield
抄送: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
主题: Re: [j-nsp] Filtering rib-group imported direct routes?
Hi Chris,
In my lab environment (GNS3+Olives) I can apply an import-policy to the rib-group that appears to achieve the effect you are after. I vaguely remember trying this on an SRX a few years ago and it not working though.
root> show configuration policy-options
policy-statement rib_filter {
term 1 {
from {
protocol direct;
route-filter 10.1.2.0/30 exact;
}
then accept;
}
term else {
then reject;
}
}
root> show configuration routing-options
interface-routes {
rib-group inet TEST;
}
rib-groups {
TEST {
import-rib [ inet.0 test.inet.0 ];
import-policy rib_filter;
}
}
root> show configuration routing-instances
test {
instance-type forwarding;
routing-options {
static {
route 0.0.0.0/0 next-hop 10.1.2.2;
}
}
}
root> show route
inet.0: 5 destinations, 5 routes (5 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
+ = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both
10.1.1.0/30 *[Direct/0] 00:34:34
> via em0.0
10.1.1.1/32 *[Local/0] 00:34:34
Local via em0.0
10.1.2.0/30 *[Direct/0] 00:34:34
> via em1.0
10.1.2.1/32 *[Local/0] 00:34:34
Local via em1.0
10.10.10.1/32 *[Direct/0] 00:34:34
> via lo0.0
test.inet.0: 2 destinations, 2 routes (2 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
+ = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both
0.0.0.0/0 *[Static/5] 00:04:23
> to 10.1.2.2 via em1.0
10.1.2.0/30 *[Direct/0] 00:04:23
> via em1.0
Hope that works for you.
Mark
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 6:27 AM, Chris Woodfield <rekoil at semihuman.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I’m currently managing a setup where we’re at our edge, we're punting packets to a routing-instance based on firewall matches in order to separate traffic between outside client traffic (which needs to be routed through the LB on return) and other internet-facing outbound. We have rib-groups configured for our routing-instances to import the direct and local routes, like the below (simplified) config example:
>
> routing-options {
> interface-routes {
> rib-group {
> inet fbf-groups;
> }
> }
> ...
> rib-groups {
> fbf-groups {
> import-rib [ inet.0 lb1.inet.0 ]
> }
> }
> }
> ...
> firewall {
> family inet {
> filter BOUNCE_TO_LB
> from {
> protocol tcp;
> source-port [ 80 443 ];
> }
> then {
> routing-instance lb1;
> }
> }
> }
> }
> ...
> routing-instances {
> lb1 {
> instance-type forwarding;
> routing-options {
> static {
> route 0.0.0.0/0 next-hop 1.2.3.4;
> }
> }
> }
> }
>
> The "lb1" routing-instance is simply a default route to the LB's gateway IP which is a directly connected interface to the router.
>
> (This design is documented here:
> https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos12.3/topics/example/l
> ogical-systems-filter-based-forwarding.html)
>
> The problem I'm having is that because this setup imports all direct and local routes into the routing instance, packets that are punted to the routing instance that are destined for other directly connected hosts bypass the default route and get forwarded directly to the end host. For example, if I have a host hanging off of interface xe-2/0/0 with address 2.2.3.4/24, and I look in the routing-instance's table, I see:
>
> edge-rtr> show route table lb1.inet.0
>
> lb.inet.0: XXX destinations, XXX routes (XXX active, 0 holddown, X
> hidden)
> + = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both
>
> 0.0.0.0/0 *[Static/5] 37w1d 15:53:29
> > to 1.2.3.4 via xe-1/0/0
> 2.2.3.4/24 *[Direct/0] 11w3d 10:42:47
> > via xe-2/0/0.0
> 2.2.3.1/32 *[Local/0] 11w3d 10:42:47
> Local via xe-2/0/0.0
>
> So a packet with dest IP 2.2.3.4 goes directly to the host instead of going to the LB, which means it has the real host IP and not the VIP's IP as its source, which means no worky worky.
>
> So the question I have is this - is there a way to filter the direct and local routes that are imported into a routing instance? In this case, I'd only want the direct route for the subnet containing 1.2.3.4, and no other direct routes.
>
> Alternatively, would it be possible to *not* import any direct routes into the routing-instance (i.e. deleting the rib-groups syntax altogether) and instead add the direct and/or local route manually to the routing instance, so I can ensure that only the direct routes I need to resolve the next hop make it into the routing instance?
>
> TIA,
>
> -Chris
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
--
Regards,
Mark L. Tees
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list