[j-nsp] Setting RTBH next-hop at RR for L3VPN routes

[Mark Tinka]

On Sunday, February 09, 2014 01:44:17 PM Phil Mayers wrote:

> It is a dedicated route-reflector i.e. not in the traffic
> path, and I have no problems reflecting regular l3vpn
> routes. But it is running MPLS (ldp & family mpls on
> core ifs), as to me this seems marginally cleaner than a
> 0.0.0.0/0 static in inet.3.

Well, IMHO, the way I've done Junos-based route reflectors 
that are neither in the forwarding path nor running MPLS is 
to import the necessary RIB's accordingly, negating the need 
for the 0/0 static route approach:

routing-options {
    rib-groups {
        IGP-RIB {
            import-rib [ inet.0 inet.3 inet6.3 ];
        }
    }
}

This way, you don't need to run MPLS on any of the route 
reflector's interfaces.

If you're willing to, perhaps try that and see if it helps.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/attachments/20140211/2f318057/attachment.sig>