[j-nsp] VPLS: site-range
Tom Storey
tom at snnap.net
Wed Jan 8 15:54:15 EST 2014
Ok, so then you could in theory just leave the site-range command out
of a VPLS config in order to go by default values, unless you needed
to enforce a maximum site count?
On 8 January 2014 11:56, Saku Ytti <saku at ytti.fi> wrote:
> On (2014-01-08 00:21 +0000), Tom Storey wrote:
>
> Hi Tom,
>
>> From the reading around I have done, the site-range basically
>> indicates how many sites maximum can/should exist for a given VPLS.
>
> Yes.
>
>> This tells the routers how many labels should be reserved for
>> conveying data between each PE that has a site that is part of a given
>> VPLS.
>
> No. Site range can be 64k, and not single label is assigned. Labels are
> assigned on-demand, in label-block-size, to cover all seen sites, not all
> possible sites.
>
>> If I say "site-range 10" then I shouldnt/cant provision more than 10
>> sites for that VPLS, because insufficient labels will have been
>> reserved for conveying data between any PE routers beyond the first
>> 10, and thus those sites will be unreachable.
>
> It won't allocate labels for higher sites, correct.
>
>> Suppose I configure all of my VPLS instances with "site-range 10"
>> initially, if I need to add more sites later, I just need to go back
>> and re-configure each VPLS instance to increase the number
>> appropriately?
>
> Yes.
>
>> The default site-range value seems to be somewhere up in the 65,000's
>> which from my reading is bad, because 65k labels will be reserved for
>> that instance, which could be pretty wasteful if the VPLS only has 3-4
>> sites.
>
> It's sane, I don't think it should be even configurable. But maybe there is
> some obscure CsC like situation where there is partial trust between two
> parties and you want to ensure no one is stealing VPLS sites without paying,
> only thing I can come up with.
> I would keep it at maximum value.
>
> --
> ++ytti
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list