[j-nsp] MX960 - Release 12.3R4

J M mejlajonas at hotmail.com
Thu Jan 23 04:02:22 EST 2014


Hi, Wojciech,

you wrote: "If you consider rsvp and link-protection, it's better to use 12.3R5"

Can you explain/clarify the concerns about rsvp and link-protection more in detail?

Is there a PR referring to?
//Jonas


 

> Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 08:54:56 +0100
> From: wojciech.janiszewski at gmail.com
> To: giuliano at wztech.com.br
> CC: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] MX960 - Release 12.3R4
> 
> Hi,
> 
> If you consider rsvp and link-protection, it's better to use 12.3R5
> 
> Regards,
> Wojciech
> 22 sty 2014 04:02, "Giuliano Medalha" <giuliano at wztech.com.br> napisał(a):
> 
> > People,
> >
> > Does anyone used JUNOS 12.3R4 on MX960 gear ?
> >
> > Is this a stable release ?
> >
> > Could you please send some feedback about it ?
> >
> > We have a recommendation of using it but we need to know if is stable or
> > not in production environment ... considering BGP and MPLS.
> >
> > Thanks a lot,
> >
> > Giuliano
> > _______________________________________________
> > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
 		 	   		  


More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list