[j-nsp] MX960 ARP issues

Marcel Plug marcelplug at gmail.com
Tue Jan 28 10:42:30 EST 2014


If packet captures on the servers don't show the arp packets getting there,
its a good bet they aren't getting there.  Have you ruled out the switch as
the culprit?  At least monitor the server's port on the switch to confirm
the arp packets are leaving the port because to me it seems like they
aren't.  I don't have any suggestions as to why that would happen but it
would be good to rule it out...




On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 10:27 AM, John Neiberger <jneiberger at gmail.com>wrote:

> I'll preface this question by saying that I don't think this is a
> problem on the router, but I'm stumped and I'm curious if anyone else
> has run into this. We have a Cisco 4948 with two uplinks to different
> MX960s we'll call RouterA and Router B. There are a few linux servers
> connected to the switch. We have good layer two connectivity between
> the routers through this vlan, evidenced by good ARP tables,
> responsive pings, and since VRRP is working correctly.
>
> The problem is that the linux servers only respond to ARP requests
> from RouterA. When RouterB sends an ARP request, the servers never see
> it. Packet captures done on the servers don't even show the packets
> arriving. I know they are because ARP is working between the routers
> and we also have an SVI on the switch in the same VLAN. We have no
> problems with ARP and those other devices. It is only these linux
> servers that don't see these particular requests.
>
> I've used "monitor traffic" to verify that the ARP requests are
> leaving the router. I also tried setting a static ARP for one of the
> servers and I was able to ping it, so we know the path is good. I
> don't know much about linux system administration, but I did ask them
> to check if iptables or arptables were running and they said no.
>
> The reason I'm nearly certain this has to be their problem is this: if
> they reboot their servers, they will respond to ARP requests for a
> short time and then they stop. That tells me that something running on
> the server must be blocking ARP requests, but why only from one
> router? It's very unusual. We've been working on this off and on for a
> few weeks and haven't been able to nail down the root cause.
>
> Any ideas? Have any of you seen anything like this before?
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>


More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list