[j-nsp] Site-To-Site VPN woes again

[Per Westerlund]

I think Mike was hinting at the hidden property  ’local-address’ to help select source address from an interface that has more than on address configured.

You won’t see it in the help, but if you enter this:

	set security ike gateway GATE local-address x.y.z.w

it will work.

This way you can use several addresses with one interface. (Extremely helpful if you migrate IPsec VPNs to an existing setup.)

/Per

6 maj 2014 kl. 14:56 skrev Mattias Gyllenvarg <mattias at gyllenvarg.se>:

> A little vague question but I will try.
> 
> The Hub is dynamic (PKI + Distinguished names).
> Spokes connect to the external IF of the HUB.
> 
> Jeff, regarding Loopbacks. Would you configure an IP from the extrenal
> scope (have a /29) as Loopback to run the VPN via?
> 
> Never though of having a loopback in the untrusted side.  :)
> 
> //Mattias
> 
> 
> On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Mike Devlin <mikecdevlin at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> are  using local-address config line under edit security ike gateway blah?
>> 
>> 
>> On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 8:24 AM, Mattias Gyllenvarg <mattias at gyllenvarg.se>wrote:
>> 
>>> Turns out the HUB node can not be on use a "secondary" IP as the Gateway
>>> IP for the IPsec termination.
>>> This workes on SRX240 in a very similar installation. But not on the
>>> SRX210HE2 in this installation.
>>> 
>>> //Mattias Gyllenvarg
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Mike Devlin <mikecdevlin at gmail.com>wrote:
>>> 
>>>> config please
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 9:33 AM, Mattias Gyllenvarg <
>>>> mattias at gyllenvarg.se> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hi All
>>>>> 
>>>>> I have been cracking my skull on this one for a while now and I am not
>>>>> getting anywhere I want to go. So, here is a nut for anyone proficient
>>>>> in
>>>>> Site-To-Site VPN with PKI and Distinguished names on SRX.
>>>>> 
>>>>> TLDR; New installation of a setup I already have working on a global
>>>>> scale.
>>>>> Only difference in HW is a SRX210HE2 as HUB compared to a 240 in the
>>>>> working installation.
>>>>> Error is NO proposal chosen. I get this even if I try it with static IPs
>>>>> and PSK.
>>>>> Junos is  [12.1X44-D20.3]
>>>>> Waiting to try [12.1X44-D30.4] but I dont have it yet.
>>>>> 
>>>>> So, I have double checked the proposals (they come from a template) many
>>>>> times.
>>>>> Removed and reapplied all security config. Reloaded and so on.
>>>>> st0.0 is in trusted and all policies are in place.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Can't find a known bug or deeper troubleshooting help then check your
>>>>> proposals, for this error.
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> *Best Regards*
>>>>> *Mattias Gyllenvarg*
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> *Med Vänliga Hälsningar / Best Regards*
>>> *Mattias Gyllenvarg*
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> *Med Vänliga Hälsningar / Best Regards*
> *Mattias Gyllenvarg*
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp