[j-nsp] ACX is just not there (was Re: EX4550 L2Circuit/VPN to MX80/lt Interface)

[Mark Tinka]

On Thursday, November 13, 2014 08:02:19 PM Daniel Verlouw 
wrote:

> vRR ? We’re about to re-evaluate our RR deployment and
> going ‘virtual / PC-based’ is certainly high on our
> list. Too bad there's hardly any info on vRR around, or
> I'm looking in the wrong place (which is not terribly
> hard after yet another poor redesign of jnpr.net....)

When I was testing it I found it too slow, and most of the 
coolness we wanted was coming later in 14.x.

CSR1000v was a lot quicker (we deployed it in ESXi) and the 
feature set was where we wanted it.

My guess is vRR is good to go now.

I'd certainly not be spending money on a real router for 
route reflection, particularly if you are inclined to only 
running Junos for this.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/attachments/20141113/cfad4761/attachment.sig>