[j-nsp] EX4550 L2Circuit/VPN to MX80/lt

[Anhost]

You can always use the mostly correct feature navigator on Junipers website. 

Sent from my iPhone

On Nov 19, 2014, at 5:05 PM, Tomasz Mikołajek <tmikolajek at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Phil.
> Here you can check MPLS functionalities which are on EX switches:
> http://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/release-independent/junos/topics/concept/ex-series-software-features-overview.html#mpls-features-by-platform-table
> 
> Tomasz Mikołajek
> 
> 
> W dniu środa, 19 listopada 2014 Philip Palanchi <palanchi at rutgers.edu>
> napisał(a):
> 
>>> the lack of LSR functionality in the EX won't work for us.
>> 
>> I'm curious to know what MPLS features or functionalities are lacking on
>> the EX4550 in comparison to MX series.
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Phil
>> 
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: juniper-nsp-request at puck.nether.net <javascript:;>
>> To: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net <javascript:;>
>> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 11:10:51 AM
>> Subject: juniper-nsp Digest, Vol 144, Issue 16
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Message: 2
>> Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 06:34:43 -0500
>> From: Austin Brower <ops at bobman.net <javascript:;>>
>> To: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net <javascript:;>
>> Subject: [j-nsp] ACX is just not there (was Re: EX4550 L2Circuit/VPN
>>        to      MX80/lt Interface)
>> Message-ID: <878B0D0E-5CF8-44B8-ABB8-2396EB781735 at bobman.net
>> <javascript:;>>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>> 
>> On Nov 12, 2014, at 10:38 AM, Eric Van Tol <bleearg at gmail.com
>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka at seacom.mu
>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Juniper have continued to come short in this area. And no,
>>>> the ACX doesn't cut it.
>>> 
>>> Agreed.  ACX is just not there.  It baffles me why Juniper has left
>>> this market untapped.  The mid-range MX is just too expensive and too
>>> big for our deployments and the lack of LSR functionality in the EX
>>> won't work for us.
>> 
>> So far, Eric, Mark, and Phil have all stated that the ACX is not the right
>> platform for their purposes.
>> 
>> Could you elaborate on why? I've been looking at the ACX with some
>> curiosity as a migration tool for some of my fiber constrained sites where
>> I have low capacity SONET systems (which are very slow to leave the
>> network) and 1Gbps Ethernet switching (utilizing finicky ERPS).
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Austin
>> _______________________________________________
>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net <javascript:;>
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp