[j-nsp] Full table in L3VPN

[Mark Tinka]

On Monday, September 01, 2014 08:53:19 PM Johan Borch wrote:

> Is it a good or bad idea to run IP transit (full table
> ipv4 & ipv6) in a MPLS L3VPN and rely on the MP-BGP to
> carry routes around or is it better to skip the MPLS
> part and run iBGP between the routers with transit
> links?

This is one of those polarizing questions where you'll get 
an equal share of answers from both sides of the bench.

We run the IPv4/IPv6 table in global.

We only run l3vpn services in a VRF.

Just us...

I know lots of network who run the Internet table in a VRF. 
Some actually in more than one VRF, even.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/attachments/20140902/9065a523/attachment.sig>