[j-nsp] Aggregate policer config

[Chris Kawchuk]

Err, I thought he had unlike-speeds for interfaces?

> 
> Customer Interface 1 is a VLAN on a 10G interface
> Customer Interface 2 is a VLAN on a 1G interface


Unless he does active-passive 1+1, but dunno if JunOS supports unlike physical interface speeds. plus means direct physical connection, instead of out an aggregated/VLAN'ed interface into his Layer-2 transport/switching/fan-out network.

I suggested doing a firewall filter (non interface-specific) against the VLANs on egress, which calls a single (specific/dedicated) policer. May have to play with the knobs on the filter if it's on different PFEs.

- Ck.



On 08/04/2015, at 11:35 PM, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka at seacom.mu> wrote:

>> Peter,
>> 
>> Would an aggregate interface assist in this? If It can be done in your
>> logical scheme, the aggregate interface would provide a simple way to apply
>> the entire X bandwidth no matter the pipes up.
> 
> Juniper do support aggregate application of a normal policer, where the
> bandwidth is shared between all member links in the LAG. So yes, this is
> a viable option.
> 
> Of course, it means the customer needs to support LACP, but on the
> bright side, you now only need one BGP session to the customer. The
> limitation with this is that if the customer has more than one router,
> it breaks the solution unless they can support MC-LAG.