[j-nsp] iBGP and IPv6
lordsith49 at hotmail.com
Wed Apr 15 10:24:55 EDT 2015
Here is the output of 'show route extensive'. Hopefully it shows up formatted properly this time. router1> ...oute 2001:db8:4000::1 extensive
vr-1.inet6.0: 9 destinations, 13 routes (9 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)2001:db8:4000::1/128 (3 entries, 1 announced)TSI:Page 0 idx 0 Type 1 val 15b53b0 Nexthop: Self Localpref: 100 AS path:  I Communities:Path 2001:db8:4000::1 Vector len 4. Val: 0 *Direct Preference: 0 Next hop type: Interface Address: 0x15b877c Next-hop reference count: 2 Next hop: via lo0.1, selected State: <Active Int> Local AS: 65471 Age: 1w0d 17:26:33 Task: IF Announcement bits (3): 0-RT 4-BGP_RT_Background 5-Resolve tree 2 AS path: I AS path: Recorded OSPF3 Preference: 10 Next hop type: Router Address: 0x15b8944 Next-hop reference count: 1 Next hop: via lo0.1, selected State: <Int> Inactive reason: Route Preference Local AS: 65471 Age: 1w0d 17:26:28 Metric: 0 Area: 0.0.0.0 Task: vr-1-OSPF3 AS path: I AS path: Recorded BGP Preference: 170/-101 Next hop type: Indirect Address: 0x15b93a8 Next-hop reference count: 3 Source: 2001:db8:4000::2 Next hop type: Router, Next hop index: 595 Next hop: fe80:db8:4000:1::3 via ge-0/0/8.0, selected Protocol next hop: 2001:db8:4000::2 Indirect next hop: 162c000 - State: <Int Ext> Inactive reason: Route Preference Local AS: 65471 Peer AS: 65471 Age: 21:46:03 Metric: 1 Metric2: 1 Task: BGP_65471_65471.2001:db8:4000::2+51820 AS path: I Accepted Localpref: 100 Router ID: 192.168.172.253 Indirect next hops: 1 Protocol next hop: 2001:db8:4000::2 Metric: 1 Indirect next hop: 162c000 - Indirect path forwarding next hops: 1 Next hop type: Router Next hop: fe80:db8:4000:1::3 via ge-0/0/8.0 2001:db8:4000::2/128 Originating RIB: vr-1.inet6.0 Metric: 1 Node path count: 1 Forwarding nexthops: 1 Nexthop: fe80:db8:4000:1::3 via ge-0/0/8.0
Jonathan> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] iBGP and IPv6
> To: lordsith49 at hotmail.com; juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> From: mark.tinka at seacom.mu
> Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 07:45:00 +0200
> On 14/Apr/15 19:37, Jonathan Call wrote:
> > Why does the router flag the BGP route for the IPv4 loopback as Unusable but doesn't do the same for the IPv6 loopback address? Does it even matter?
> Can you "show extensive" for the route?
> Also, try formatting your paste better - I can't quite make it out.
More information about the juniper-nsp