[j-nsp] Stable JunOS for MX80

Robert Hass robhass at gmail.com
Thu Apr 16 07:19:44 EDT 2015


Can you write something details regarding this bug which you encountering
on 11.4R ?

Rob


On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 11:28 AM, thiyagarajan b <bn.thiyagarajan at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Rapheal,
> 11.4 is what we are running now,where we encountered a bug forcing us to
> upgrade. 12.3R8 have few memory related bugs which seems to be resolved in
> 14.1R4.
>
> Warm Regards.
>
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 2:40 PM, Raphael Mazelier <raph at futomaki.net>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Le 16/04/15 10:58, thiyagarajan b a écrit :
> >
> >> Thanks All for your suggestions,
> >> Have taken 14.1R4 OS which has no bugs relating to our config. The
> memory
> >> (2GB RAM and Flash) would suffice?
> >>
> >>
> > The best release will depends of our need.
> > Basicly if you do not want sampling you are safe running stable 11.4
> > branch. Or use the jtac recommanded version : 12.3R8.7.
> >
> > --
> > Raphael Mazelier
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> >
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>


More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list