[j-nsp] SRX240 for route-reflector?

[Stepan Kucherenko]

No. Just don't.

SRX has 1 weak MIPS CPU for control plane and it's incredibly slow 
(commits took ages). Just get a couple of vMX/vRR and use them as a VM 
on a non-outdated x86 server, it'll work great.

On 17.08.2015 08:34, Alex K. wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> One of my colleagues suggested using SRX240 us a route-reflector in our
> network.
>
> Since I've never seen SRX in such deployment, I'll be glad to know your
> opinion on that.
>
> The requirements are - MPLS VPN, L2VPN support (both VPLS and Pseudo wires)
> and multicast VRFs support. It is worth mentioning, the network comprised
> of both Cisco and Juniper gear.
>
> Every thought on the subject will be welcomed.
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>