[j-nsp] Breaking an EX cluster?

Levi Pederson levipederson at mankatonetworks.net
Mon Aug 17 14:53:30 EDT 2015


Scott,

Something else to consider.

In the configuration of the current 2 member VC

1. Do you have a static membership using the following?
  set virtual-chassis preprovisioned
set virtual-chassis no-split-detection
set virtual-chassis member 0 role routing-engine
set virtual-chassis member 0 serial-number ##1
set virtual-chassis member 1 role routing-engine
set virtual-chassis member 1 serial-number ##2

2.  Do you have set virtual-chassis no-split-detection "recommended for
only 2 member VC's"

*Levi Pederson*
Mankato Networks LLC
cell | 612.481.0769
work | 612.787.7392
levipederson at mankatonetworks.net


On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Scott Granados <scott at granados-llc.net>
wrote:

> Ah thanks for the link.
>
> I tried googling and didn’t find much so this will be helpful.
>
> Thank you
>
> > On Aug 17, 2015, at 2:39 PM, Kevin Wormington <kworm at sofnet.com> wrote:
> >
> > I don't know if sub-versions would matter or not, IIRC my case was
> something like 12.x and 13.x.  It's been a while, I may have also followed
> the instructions from:
> >
> >
> http://forums.juniper.net/t5/Ethernet-Switching/Disable-Virtual-Chasis-on-EX4200/td-p/46663
> >
> > On 08/17/2015 01:32 PM, Scott Granados wrote:
> >> Ah very interesting.  I didn’t think of that.
> >>
> >> The switches all have what ever they were shipped and manufactured
> with.  13.2X51 but not sure if the sub version matches.  I will give that a
> look and match them up if they aren’t a matching set.
> >>
> >>
> >>> On Aug 17, 2015, at 2:29 PM, Kevin Wormington <kworm at sofnet.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Are these units all running the same version of JunOS?  If the lab
> units have a new version or vice-versa it could spell trouble.  I ran into
> a similar issue with 4300's and zeroing them and upgrading JunOS to the
> latest recommend version with no VCP modules/cables installed and then
> forming the chassis one unit at a time did the trick.
> >>>
> >>> Kevin
> >>> On 08/17/2015 01:19 PM, Scott Granados wrote:
> >>>> So let me  be a bit more clear.
> >>>>
> >>>> I have an existing lab chassis.  It’s just something we use to test
> on etc.  We received 2 more decommissioned 4300 members from the field to
> add to the stack.  Right now it’s a stack of 2 and I’d like to make this
> 4.  The existing 2 member chassis boots fine, all the VCP ports show
> adjacency and all is good in the hood.:)
> >>>> When I take the 3rd member whether I zeroize the new member to join
> it restarts but a link is never formed with the VCP ports.  I’m using the
> built in 40G ports and juniper cables that I obtained from Juniper for the
> back plain wiring on the stack.  No matter what I try I can’t get physical
> link between the two existing member chassis and one of my proposed
> repurposed members or member 3 in this case.  (line card roll)
> >>>>
> >>>> I’m leaning towards hardware problem because I can’t get link no
> matter what I attach to the new switches VCP port but the two in the
> original functional chassis form adjacencies on all 4 cables.  So it’s
> adding the new to an existing that’s the problem.  Could be process and a
> very real possibility it’s the guy behind the keyboard writing this that’s
> the problem but not getting physical link was pointing me at hardware
> problems.  I just wanted to make sure I cleaned out the previous configs
> from the proposed new member well enough to not cause it to fail to join.
> >>>>
> >>>> Does that make a bit more sense?
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks for you and everyone else responses as well. It’s very much
> appreciated.
> >>>>
> >>>> Scott
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Aug 17, 2015, at 1:59 PM, Levi Pederson <
> levipederson at mankatonetworks.net<mailto:levipederson at mankatonetworks.net>>
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Scott,
> >>>>
> >>>> I was under the assumption you wanted to zerorize and remove a unit
> from a Virtual Chassis.  Hence the use of system zeorize.
> >>>>
> >>>> If you wanted to completely erase and re-setup a new VC with old
> members of a previous that is a different story.
> >>>>
> >>>> I think you issue might be process related.
> >>>>
> >>>> I would erase and and pre-setup (partially) the first switch in the
> NEW VC with no VC cables attached.
> >>>>
> >>>> Then connect the VC cables and power on the next member (previously
> zeroized).
> >>>>
> >>>> That should bring up the VC between the two devices.
> >>>>
> >>>> The other option would be to statically assign the VC nodes using the
> serial numbers.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thank you,
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Levi Pederson
> >>>> Mankato Networks LLC
> >>>> cell | 612.481.0769
> >>>> work | 612.787.7392
> >>>> levipederson at mankatonetworks.net<mailto:
> levipederson at mankatonetworks.net>
> >>>> [http://www.mankatonetworks.com/images/mn_logo_email.png]
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Scott Granados <
> scott at granados-llc.net<mailto:scott at granados-llc.net>> wrote:
> >>>> Hi Ross, I had tried this but still no link.  I believe I have a
> hardware problem at work causing the vc ports not to link.  Zeroize seemed
> to do the trick but with out connectivity I’m Dead in the water.  Time to
> RMA I think.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks
> >>>> Scott
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Aug 17, 2015, at 1:20 PM, Ross Halliday <
> ross.halliday at wtccommunications.ca<mailto:
> ross.halliday at wtccommunications.ca>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Since you want to nuke the config anyway, break the switch out of
> the VC and use
> >>>>>
> >>>>>       request system zeroize
> >>>>>
> >>>>> You may want to assign the soon-to-be-former member an RE role, if
> it's not an automatically elected cluster, just to make things a little
> easier.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Cheers
> >>>>> Ross
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>> From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> <mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net>] On Behalf Of Scott Granados
> >>>>> Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2015 9:23 PM
> >>>>> To: juniper-nsp
> >>>>> Subject: [j-nsp] Breaking an EX cluster?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hi,
> >>>>> Have some EX 4300s that I want to break apart and start like they
> were factory new and reboot.  I know about the factory default button on
> the front and the configuration option but no matter how I apply that I
> still have the node boot thinking it’s a member of the previous chassis.
> How do I delete it’s membership when it’s active / a stand alone node?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Any pointers are most appreciated.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thank you
> >>>>> Scott
> >>>>>
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net<mailto:
> juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net>
> >>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net<mailto:
> juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net>
> >>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> >>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> >>>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> >>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> >>
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list