[j-nsp] [c-nsp] draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-16

Adam Vitkovsky Adam.Vitkovsky at gamma.co.uk
Fri Feb 20 17:36:33 EST 2015

Hi Gert,

I knew someone will dig into private addresses and topology hiding :).
Come one, customers get network blueprints all the time, its BAU.
And they get angry over broken/poor network performance not because they can't see P-core boxes in the traceroute.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
> Gert Doering
> Sent: 20 February 2015 18:40
> To: Adam Vitkovsky
> Cc: Juniper-Nsp; nanog at nanog.org; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] [j-nsp] draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-16
> Hi,
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 04:33:19PM +0000, Adam Vitkovsky wrote:
> > And most importantly it's not actually needed it's just a whim of network
> operators.
> You might have enough IPv4 addresses to use for your infrastructure -
> many others haven't.
> (And no, RFC1918 addresses and MPLS topology hiding is what leads to
> disgruntled customers going elsewhere)
> gert
> --
> USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
>                                                            //www.muc.de/~gert/
> Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
> fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
 This email has been scanned for email related threats and delivered safely by Mimecast.
 For more information please visit http://www.mimecast.com

More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list