[j-nsp] [c-nsp] draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-16
Adam Vitkovsky
Adam.Vitkovsky at gamma.co.uk
Fri Feb 20 17:36:33 EST 2015
Hi Gert,
I knew someone will dig into private addresses and topology hiding :).
Come one, customers get network blueprints all the time, its BAU.
And they get angry over broken/poor network performance not because they can't see P-core boxes in the traceroute.
adam
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
> Gert Doering
> Sent: 20 February 2015 18:40
> To: Adam Vitkovsky
> Cc: Juniper-Nsp; nanog at nanog.org; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] [j-nsp] draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-16
>
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 04:33:19PM +0000, Adam Vitkovsky wrote:
> > And most importantly it's not actually needed it's just a whim of network
> operators.
>
> You might have enough IPv4 addresses to use for your infrastructure -
> many others haven't.
>
> (And no, RFC1918 addresses and MPLS topology hiding is what leads to
> disgruntled customers going elsewhere)
>
> gert
>
> --
> USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
> //www.muc.de/~gert/
> Gert Doering - Munich, Germany gert at greenie.muc.de
> fax: +49-89-35655025 gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This email has been scanned for email related threats and delivered safely by Mimecast.
For more information please visit http://www.mimecast.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list