[j-nsp] MC-LAG and layer 3 routing

[Tomasz Mikołajek]

We don't have only one vendor.

W dniu czwartek, 9 lipca 2015 Dave Bell <me at geordish.org> napisał(a):

> What are the switches? If they are EX series, you could do redundant
> trunk groups up to the MX, have the port facing the switches and the
> port between the MXs in a bridge domain, and configure an irb
> interface running VRRP between them.
>
> Regards,
> Dave
>
> On 9 July 2015 at 10:16, Tomasz Mikołajek <tmikolajek at gmail.com
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > http://imgur.com/xI5VdGn
> >
> > W dniu czwartek, 9 lipca 2015 besscou <besscou at gmail.com <javascript:;>>
> napisał(a):
> >
> >> Hi,
> >> Could you provide the architecture?
> >>
> >> Tomasz Mikołajek <tmikolajek at gmail.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;>>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Hello.
> >> >I have two MX5 routers. I would like to configure mc-lags and to hosts
> in
> >> >my network. Do i have to use vrrp and rvi to get HA or i can only
> >> configure
> >> >same gateway on mc-lag interface?
> >> >Thank you in advance for help.
> >> >_______________________________________________
> >> >juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net <javascript:;>
> <javascript:;>
> >> >https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net <javascript:;>
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>