[j-nsp] MX104 Limitations

[Scott Granados]

I have set up the 104 in over seas pops and taken several views with out issue.
At a minimum 2 full table feeds + some peering.  SHouldn’t be a problem.

> On Jul 9, 2015, at 10:44 AM, sthaug at nethelp.no wrote:
> 
>>> But MX104 can't hold the full internet routing table in forwarding-table so it's good only for peering or can it indeed?
>> 
>> Can't it? I've assumed it can. Haven't actually deployed one yet.
> 
> It sure can. Last info I got from Juniper: 1.8M IPv4 or IPv6 prefixes
> (or a combination of the two).
> 
> We have quite a few MX104s in production with a full table, plus
> assorted L3VPNs.
> 
> Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug at nethelp.no
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp