[j-nsp] MX104 Limitations

Tue Jul 14 02:09:54 EDT 2015

Hi 

I'm also using MX 104 in my core network with two full BGP feed and some IX route which working fine . 

     On Friday, July 10, 2015 3:41 AM, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka at seacom.mu> wrote:

On 9/Jul/15 17:57, Saku Ytti wrote:
> It's standard C15/C16 which is temperature enchanced (120c) version of
> standard C13/C14. Lot of vendors are doing that these days, I'd like to
> understand why. Is there some new recommendation for fire safety or what has
> triggered the change.

We're seeing the same on the ME1200 as well. A little annoying, but
manageable.

Mark.
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp