[j-nsp] Adding IRB to VPLS

Cydon Satyr cydonsatyr at gmail.com
Fri Jun 12 09:31:38 EDT 2015


Also what's the point of connection-type irb then?

Thanks a lot

On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 3:19 PM, Cydon Satyr <cydonsatyr at gmail.com> wrote:

> That makes perfect sense...
> But why are there examples with only irb interfaces in vpls?
> Also, your examples requires that IFL have vlan-vpls encap, whereas in my
> case i have bridge encap.
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 3:08 PM, Sebastian Wiesinger <
> sebastian at karotte.org> wrote:
>
>> * Cydon Satyr <cydonsatyr at gmail.com> [2015-06-12 15:03]:
>> > I am trying to configure what Cisco would call a routed pseudowire. I'm
>> > trying to do this by configuring bridge-domain with irb, and using that
>> irb
>> > in VPLS instance (and vrf instance), like this:
>> >
>> > routing-instances {
>> >     vpls-red {
>> [..]
>> >     }
>> > }
>> > bridge-domains {
>> >     vpls-red {
>> [..]
>> >     }
>> > }
>> >
>> > The error I'm getting is:
>> >
>> > "  'vpls-red'
>> >     Interface irb.351, cannot be associated with multiple
>> domains/instances
>> > [default-switch vpls-red 0 and vpls-red __vpls-red__ 0]
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> don't configure a separate bridge-domain. Your VPLS instance bridges.
>> Just put the interfaces in your vpls instance as different sites:
>>
>>  routing-instances {
>>      vpls-red {
>>          instance-type vpls;
>>          vlan-id none;
>>          routing-interface irb.351;
>>          route-distinguisher 150.1.3.1:351;
>>          vrf-target target:351:351;
>>          protocols {
>>              vpls {
>>                  no-tunnel-services;
>>                  site 2 {
>>                      site-identifier 2;
>>                      interface ge-1/0/0.351;
>>                  }
>>                  site X {
>>                      site-identifier X;
>>                      interface ge-1/1/0.352;
>>                  }
>>                  connectivity-type irb;
>>              }
>>          }
>>      }
>>  }
>>
>> Be warned: this assumed that the two interfaces are not connected. If
>> they are connected you would create a loop.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Sebastian
>>
>> --
>> GPG Key: 0x93A0B9CE (F4F6 B1A3 866B 26E9 450A  9D82 58A2 D94A 93A0 B9CE)
>> 'Are you Death?' ... IT'S THE SCYTHE, ISN'T IT? PEOPLE ALWAYS NOTICE THE
>> SCYTHE.
>>             -- Terry Pratchett, The Fifth Elephant
>> _______________________________________________
>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>>
>
>


More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list