[j-nsp] VPLS pass tagged/untagged traffic

Kevin Wormington kworm at sofnet.com
Sun Mar 8 11:56:36 EDT 2015


Shouldn't the vpls connection be down with MM instead of LD/RD if MTU 
were an issue?

On 03/08/2015 10:25 AM, Linder, Todd wrote:
> Possible MTU issue?
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Mar 8, 2015, at 9:57 AM, Kevin Wormington <kworm at sofnet.com> wrote:
>>
>> Eduardo,
>>
>> I have tried the following for encapsulation on the ingress port.  The vpls connections are down...one in the LD status and the other in RD. PE2 logical system configured identically other than using port ge-1/1/8 as ingress.
>>
>> main instance:
>>
>>     ge-1/1/0 {
>>         encapsulation flexible-ethernet-services;
>>         flexible-vlan-tagging;
>>     }
>>
>>
>>
>> on the PE1 logical system:
>>         interfaces {
>>             ge-1/1/0 {
>>                 unit 0 {
>>             encapsulation vlan-vpls
>>                     vlan-id-range 1-4096
>>                     family vpls; (have tried with and without this)
>>                 }
>>             }
>>
>> then on the routing instance in PE1:
>>
>>         routing-instances {
>>             VPLS1 {
>>                 instance-type vpls;
>>                 vlan-id all;
>>                 interface ge-1/1/0.0;
>>                 route-distinguisher 10.100.0.4:100;
>>                 vrf-target target:127:100;
>>                 protocols {
>>                     vpls {
>>                         site-range 4;
>>                         site CE1 {
>>                             site-identifier 1;
>>                         }
>>                     }
>>                 }
>>             }
>>         }
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 03/08/2015 01:37 AM, Eduardo Schoedler wrote:
>>> Probably is your encapsulation on ingress port.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Eduardo
>>>
>>> Em domingo, 8 de março de 2015, Kevin Wormington <kworm at sofnet.com
>>> <mailto:kworm at sofnet.com>> escreveu:
>>>
>>>     Hi,
>>>
>>>     On MX (Specifically MX80 w/12.3R9.4) is it possible to pass all
>>>     customer CE traffic whether it's tagged or untagged from a port on
>>>     PE1 to a port on PE2 using VPLS (BGP/RSVP)?
>>>
>>>     I have a lab system using logical systems with ports looped back and
>>>     I can get untagged traffic to work fine, but can't seem to get it to
>>>     pass everything through.
>>>
>>>     Thanks,
>>>
>>>     Kevin
>>>     _________________________________________________
>>>     juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>>     https://puck.nether.net/__mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>>>     <https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Eduardo Schoedler
>> _______________________________________________
>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list